Question:
Should junk food be banned in the USA?
anonymous
1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC
Should junk food be banned in the USA?
23 answers:
bill j
2010-09-06 05:26:59 UTC
Yes. And since sex causes the transmission of AIDS it should be banned too. In America 30,000 to 40,000 people die in car wrecks every year so lets ban cars. Working causes stress which causes heart attacks so lets ban jobs. Eating leads to obesity so lets ban that.



We will all be broke, dead and extinct as a species but we will be healthy.
?
2010-09-06 05:20:50 UTC
No, I think not.



For one thing, iodized salt is very important.



For another, who died and made you silly? Canned food lasts much longer, despite the sodium content. Enjoy your zombie apocalypse without it.
anonymous
2010-09-06 08:02:00 UTC
more addicting then heroin or cocaine? obviously you have never been addicted to either of those substances.



food is addicting? wait, you mean our brains are wired to like eating? the thing that keeps us alive?



the government is now trying to tamper with human biology. this **** has to stop.
?
2010-09-06 07:12:34 UTC
YOU CAN HAVE MY POP TARTS, WHEN YOU PRY THEM FROM MY COLD DEAD HAND!!!
?
2010-09-06 12:17:57 UTC
Wouldn't that... I don't know... take away some of our freedom and the money that comes from all of those things you listed?
anonymous
2010-09-06 08:23:08 UTC
Just being alive is dangerous to your health. Everything in moderation and you wont go wrong.
sister_godzilla
2010-09-06 06:20:11 UTC
Politicians should be banned as well because they lead to the detriment of our health.

(stress, depression, heart attacks, becoming unhinged and desiring to throw a brick through the TV screen while listening to them, etc.)
thisisonlyatest
2010-09-06 05:54:47 UTC
I suggest you read nutrition action. It's the newsletter for "Center of science in the interest of public health. " it's a nonprofit who actually reports the truth, and though some of what you're saying is true, some of it very wrong.



Popcorn's very good for you. It's the artificial butter that's the problem. It's filling and low in calories.

Tea, eggs, beans, potatoes. cheese and red meat, also very good for you in moderation. Sugar and salt also aren't bad, they're just bad in the amounts we eat.



There's a very fine line between laws that protect the people from unscrupulous marketers and food companies that couldn't care less about our health and a full fledged dictatorship.

I believe you've just crossed it.





BTW, the uk study you're referring to (was in nutrition action) and was referring to the additives in foods, like the preservatives and the artificial dyes. Those should be banned. Not the food.
♥Pardonne Moi♥
2010-09-06 05:27:33 UTC
So, how did the prohibition work out for you? I can just see a new crop of gangs springing up. You cannot dictate everything, but maybe some stiffer rules for people on welfare that choose to be obese and have the health problems associated with it. and FYI, ketchup and mustard and half the food on your list does not make you fat.
munky
2010-09-06 09:31:44 UTC
OH MY GOD! PEOPLE ARE SO RETARDED!! The government has NO RIGHT to tell us what to eat and what not to. People like you irritate the hell out of me. Don't worry about what other people do. We aren't hurting anyone are we? no. We aren't forcing it down our throat. You can stop eating all that food but don't make others. if we want to eat a stupid twinky then we should be able to eat one. for god sakes....POTATOES??? WHITE RICE?? EGGS?? RED MEAT?? you mean to tell me that a potato--a healthy food--should be banned? you are crazy. people who think like you are crazy.
Veronica
2016-04-13 06:11:51 UTC
This won't help. What we need to do is reduce the size of the portions of everything mentioned. Years ago a Large Coke at McDonald's was 20 ounces. Now a large is nearly double the size. Fried chicken, yes. Eat two pieces, not the entire bucket. TV dinners, these things have gotten huge and they're all carbohydrates. Deep fried crap disguised as food. The childhood obesity is in part the parents' fault for not regulating what and how much their child eats. The schools don't help with junk food vending machines. They talk a good game of reducing fat and sugars in schools, and in the diet in general, but it all comes down to money. And let's face it, food companies are not concerned about your / my / our health, they want profit. Which isn't bad by itself. WE'RE the ones that need to make the choice whether to eat their products or not, and we have complete freedom ( right now) to do so. So ultimately, it's not the Government's job, or the food company's job to regulate what we eat. We're the ones that have to regulate what we put in our mouths. And frankly I prefer it stay that way. Edit: There are a few problems with this list. Fizzy drinks (Coca Cola, Pepsi, Dr Pepper, Sprite etc) Pop / soda / fizzy drinks were never consumed so heavily, they used to be more of a once a week treat. Alcoholic drinks. The medical community is saying (for the moment) a drink a day helps your heart. Moderation is the key. Tea and Coffee: This is confusing because one minute, we're told coffee and tea and the fountain of youth, then briefly we're told they will kill you in a week if your drink enough of it. Say, five gallons in one sitting. Eggs: The whites are an excellent source of protein without the cholesterol. Cheese: Now I know Europeans love cheese, and so do we Americans. The secret is not to eat the entire wheel in a day. White bread: Actually I have a medical condition where eating whole grain and whole wheat breads dumps too much phosphorus into my system. Red meat: Same here, many diets require high protein, high iron content. Red meat is perfect. Not a 20 ounce steak all the time, but again, small regulated portions. Chocolate bars, Candy, Cake, Cookies, Pie, Ice Cream Jelly, Popsicles, Milkshakes, Brownies, Donuts: You would have a war on your hands if you banned these. Again, Moderation. You don't have to eat the whole package of cookies at once. Popcorn: Popcorn by itself, without butter and salt, is actually good for you-- at least under the radar for the bad stuff. Air popped popcorn has almost no fat, calories, or choleserol. But let's face it, it also tastes like cardboard. Curry: Curry is a spice, how can that be bad for any reason? Cotton Candy, Gingerbread Men: Now seriously, how much or how many of these does one have during the year. One or even three cotton candies at the fair is not going to hurt you. A tenth one the every day will, but not one a few times a year. Ketchup, Mustard, Relish: Again how many people make a regular diet of these things? Salt, Sugar: These are sort of iffy. One does need salt in the diet, just not enough to melt the snow off their driveway. A teaspoon of sugar is like 15 calories.
anonymous
2010-09-06 10:36:48 UTC
No banning it is not an option. The logic behind any argument to ban anything is based on the incidence of abuse. And no matter what you do people will abuse it: drugs, alcohol, food - it is all the same. In America we have shown, by in large, that we don't have the self control to responsibly consume unhealthy foods. So instead of banning a better case would be to tax it, not to gain more money from the item being taxed but to discourage it's use. In every management study, whether it be energy usage, drugs, food, the vast vast majority of people respond to financial ques. This is unfortunate because it is treating a symptom (over consumption) rather than the cause: Irresponsibility.



The truth is the band-aid is a far easier treatment than changing the behavior.
xpatinasia
2010-09-06 05:38:56 UTC
"A recent scientific study in the UK has proven that junk food is more addictive and damaging than heroine and cocaine."



That's not true, despite your claim. If you believe that ketchup is more addictive than heroin or cocaine, it is obvious you do not know what you are talking about. Regardless, junk food should not be banned.
Oscar
2010-09-06 07:44:19 UTC
I don't really give a rats behind about most things. But you start messing with my food, be it banning or another crap for brains sin tax. Over that I will go to war. So if you think war is better for your health go for it.



But it would never get that far. I don't think I would have any problem rounding up enough people to vote any politician out of office who tried it. Most people like to eat young, middle aged or old.



Get this nobody died and left you or your buds in charge of anything. If you have a problem with those things then don't consume them. That is your choice. You don't get to chose for the rest of us.
anonymous
2010-09-06 07:06:31 UTC
Sure. Ban everybody's job who works in the processing, growing, shipping and retailing of those products. Let's all go back to the stone age. We can all move to a warm climate and eat raw fruits and vegetables right off the vine. Why even bother with clothing. No need for soaps detergents or phosphate products either. Lets just shut down everything. No petroleum, no coal, no wood burning, no gas drilling, no air conditioning, Nothing made of plastic. We can all live under a tree in the woods and have lots of trees to hug.
Trix
2010-09-06 07:48:11 UTC
No, not really. I will say there is alot of Junk food nowadays than when I was a kid. Many of those things listed, I wouldn't call Junk food though. I say people need to have better self control. And the grocery shoppers of families shouldn't be buying alot of junk for their families. Make better choices so their family learns to eat right.
modraniht
2010-09-06 06:58:22 UTC
No. It should not be banned. I grew up eating junk food and continue to do so. I am a responsible, productive, and healthy person. No medical problems.
?
2010-09-06 05:20:02 UTC
It shouldn't be banned, but there should be stricter laws in place as far as letting Americans know what exactly is in the food. Many things, like ingredients that create benzene in soda are not listed, and that's not right. That said, Americans seriously need to learn moderation.
ok_ranger
2010-09-06 05:37:44 UTC
The U.S. tried banning alcohol nearly a hundred years ago, and that did not work. Good luck on trying to ban those other products. Maybe a "Junk Food Tax" would be more prudent than banning?
LibertyLover101
2010-09-06 07:19:07 UTC
More addictive than Heroin? LOL You are a Communist. What the hell gives YOU the right to tell others how to live. Go F yourself Comrade!
Paula
2010-09-06 07:09:44 UTC
The Health Nazis who created the "recent scientific study in the UK" need to be ignored.



Maybe they and their ilk will go away.
Rusty Shackleford
2010-09-06 17:58:51 UTC
wow, get over it, we kicked your *** in the Revolutionary War,



we are our own country now, and have progressed more in our 250 year history than you have in your entire history
anonymous
2010-09-06 06:28:13 UTC
Yes we need big brother telling us what to eat. Not really I don't need you or a government telling me what to to eat.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...