Do you think a few important questions were left unanswered by Hillary yesterday?

Question

I sense a bit of obfuscation* in some of her diatribes & crocodile tears. And yet the most important questions were unanswered. Who was she trying not to throw in front of the "bus"?
* I like using that word it almost sounds dirty.
a. herself
b. her deputies
c. Or do you think it could be #1 normally known as Obama himself?
d. or do you leftists think I'm barking up the wrong tree?

Answer 1

Yes because no one asked who was fired because of the lies that were put out. Why were the pleas ignored about needing more help. Why did she and others not resign when it came out that it was not because of the so called movie on the internet.

Other questions as well. However she cried just on cue and got indigent about being asked questions about facts rather than myth.

Most on the left will believe that you are barking up the wrong tree because they will not see any wrong with what the administration has done.

Answer 2

Why is everybody all ways picking on me? She's well versed on how to deflect blame. Righteous indignation. What does it matter now? Well, let's see: Murder, corruption & neglect of duties, illegal use of State Department for selfish gain, Lying to FBI & several more charges. But, she once again said that she took full responsibility. Which means: I'm guilty & you know it and there's not a damn thing you will do about it.

Answer 3

because all of us want to understand what existence is about and exceedingly what it potential to love in this existence and the subsequent. Philosophy potential "love of expertise" (philo - love, sophia - expertise) and the extra we search for expertise, the extra information we attain. The extra all of us recognize someone, the extra we are able to love that individual, because with extra information about someone there is extra to savor. Philosophy fairly bargains with each and every ingredient of existence and adventure and considering the fact that everybody reports many diverse issues daily, many people may have comments interior the philosophy area. it is a shame that philosophy isn't that substantial to maximum folk. those who learn philosophy get annoyed at cases because philosophy in a lot of cases will advance extra questions than you commence with and leaves many questions unanswered. Philosophy is ideal even as it is studied alongside with Theology (learn of God). Philosophy will advance the questions, yet Theology solutions them, or a minimum of maximum of them. Philosophy and Theology artwork jointly. Philosophy isn't in ordinary words subjective (as someone stated before) neither is it in ordinary words purpose. Subjectivity is all about what i imagine, experience, and trust. Objectivity is about all that exists outdoors of one's self (this international and the subsequent). Objectivity factors out the actual shown reality that some truths exist even if people want to trust them or no longer. Subjectivity and Objectivity artwork jointly. existence is about what one believes, even if it is likewise about what certainly exists outdoors of ourselves.

Answer 4

I think Rand Paul nailed it.

Answer 5

No, but I'm sure women haters everywhere will dig some up.



.

Answer 6

No, we think you don't know what a tree is.