Were one or more methods used to take down the World Trade Centre buildings of 9/11?

Question

This site has some threads discussing possible nuclear devices used on WTC of 9/11
It shows pictures and photos also. Photos of steel beams rusted and others shrivelled.
http://engforum.pravda.ru/showthread.php?p=3033146

This next site gives credence to the use of "Hutchison's Effect" or molecular dissociation on the WTC buildings. With clear photos of tires and vinyl seating intact while the car frames have been melted ....even rusting. Steel beams shrivelled.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LugeYb4h4aM&feature=related

Other material :

Eye Witness reports of bombs and detonations in World Trade Centre buildings on 9/11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHsbeJXvAHc



CENSORED 60 Minutes Interview http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pB0uN70dPJs&feature=fvw
This interview was buried (censored).....Former 2001 Bush Secretary Treasurer Paul O'Neil tells about the plans to take out Iraq and overtake its oil resources....6 months before 9/11. Even though the ending is more of a campaign add.....The guts of the story is enough to show early conspiring.

Answer 1

As a former Military Lawyer who has seen the propaganda machine at work first-hand, 9-11 has all of the ear marks of an inside job.



I am convinced that 9-11 was an inside job.



Why I believe the propaganda machine was hard at work:



1. Within hours, news media were broadcasting stories, identifying the 19 alleged hijackers.



2. Later on 9-11, video clips showed the alleged hijackers at a night club and at the terminal.



3. 9-11 evening news stories, showing the Miami apartment where the alleged hijackers stayed, complete with interviews of the landlord; clips of the air flight school where hijackers allegedly learned how to fly a 747.



4. Overkill with circumstantial evidence: The same day, the rental car of the hijackers was located at Logan Airport, complete with a Koran in the glove box; The passport of one of the hijackers was found amid the rubble of World Trade Center: INTACT!



Evidence of an inside job:



1. Traces of nano-thermitic explosives, only used by the US Military or licensed demolition companies, was found at WTC site.



2. The WTC site was cleaned immediately, rubble taken to disposal sites, and scrap iron sold to China and Japan. WTC was a crime site. Compare the government response to the Pan Am Flight 103.

Answer 2

No. Those clips are interesting. But, jet fuel can burn hot enough in open air to ruin the structural integrity of a large building. The jet fuel in the jet is burned and pushed through the nozzle in a manner that doesn't hurt the surrounding material much when it's in operation, but when released and not contained, it can easily melt the internal structure of a building. That, and, of course, the physical collision of one corner of the building, since the plane has a decent amount of mass, and tall buildings are not made of brick, lol...



Yes, early conspiring did happen in a way, on the part of the terrorists. It was meant as a simple attack from different several sides to cause "terror". It's a bad joke to say so, because it's very much like what aliens did in the movie, "Independence Day". Maybe, that's where they got the idea, or vice versa :)



Now, you could take the viewpoint that the government staged it as an excuse to spend tax money to attack the taliban, but you'd be wrong. Such an act would only ruin the economy, of which the airlines are a big part.



In any case, the terrorist mentality is pretty simple: just to make people afraid with killing a few that trust something. Basically, efficiency for what ends up as a bad result for everyone.

Answer 3

Really? You're putting youtube as a source? You do realise all of your 'evidence' was de-bunked ages ago?



There were no nuclear devices. Know why? They'd have done a lot more than take out the World Trade Towers, and we'd currently have hundreds of rescue workers and survivors suffering from cancer and other diseases from radiation exposure. Also, aeroplanes flying into the buildings in the way they did would cause more than enough damage for the towers to collapse.



There was only one method - terrorists flying aeroplanes into the buildings. Sorry your government wasn't involved, sorry there was no cover up. Anyone would think you and the other conspiracy theory nuts WANTED it to be an inside job!

Answer 4

A documentary called Loose Change may have some information for you.



Look for "Loose Change" on YouTube.



I wish I could be more help than this.

Answer 5

Osama bin Laden wants you to believe that his organization did it. If you want to drive Osama nuts, blame it on Bush or the Zionists or the Freemasons. Osama hates that.

Answer 6

No. Nuclear devices would have left unusual radioactivity that was not seen, and would have been much more devastating. uitchinson's effects are not reproducible, and so cannot be used as controlled weapons. In my view they are con-tricks designed to take your money.

Answer 7

Good grief, all this craps been debunked years ago. If you wish to purposefully remain ignorant and appear insane, by all means, it's your life and reputation. There was no inside job, as that would have been highly impossible without significant witnesses and evidence...AND NONE EXIST!

Answer 8

http://conspiracyscience.com/articles/zeitgeist/part-two/



A lot of the information you will find on conspiracy websites is debunked on that website.



http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=loose+change+debunked&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a



Take a look at all of the counter arguments before making a decision. That is what most people fail to do in this case and hypocritically acuse others of not being open to the facts.

Answer 9

there were bombs in the buildings in 1993



and in 2001



9/11 was an inside job and govt coverup