Question:
Wikileaks what the hell?
Marian
2010-12-02 02:04:07 UTC
Top leaders/presidents all around the world gossiping & criticizing about each other during private conversations and now this information is out in the public! One example: The president of Afghanistan had a conversation criticized about another president in a private closed room, this information was not being recorder therefor how could this info. come into the public? President of Turkey used bad names towards another president during a private lunch with his friends and now this info. came into the public? And now the U.S. has arrested someone who they are sure of who was involved in all this! What is this a joke or a riddle?
Eight answers:
anonymous
2010-12-02 04:03:24 UTC
This was done intentionally to gain control of the Internet itself. Control of the INTERNET has been the holy grail from the beginning. Control the message then you can control the masses. The leaking of the classified information is criminal, the posting of it, irresponsible, but is it legal for Wiki to post it, yes the 1st Amendment allows them to do so. Are these e-mails detrimental to the USA, not really. Will the release of them and the outcry help the government gain control over the internet...you bet.



You have been warned.



If I owned Wiki would I have posted them, NO but is it my right to be able to do so??? YES.
anonymous
2016-10-04 05:56:10 UTC
Wikileaks looks to be a ploy, a cause to additional take rights clear of the individuals and there web use. Hoe would this many records be leaked? The CIA would have took him out lengthy in the past in the event that they desired
anonymous
2010-12-02 02:20:20 UTC
wikileaks is only the conduit , shut it down 4 more will spring up



the problem is with the people supplying wikileaks with the info and yet balancing the need to protect honest whistle blowers



ill be on the side of the whistle blowers almost every time
anonymous
2010-12-02 02:24:34 UTC
Wiki leaks is nothing more than another "Mind Control Tool" taken over by CIA.

Look at two statements of Clinton:"Wiki leaks proves world shares concern over nuclear Iran"

and on the other hand she says""United States strongly condemns the illegal disclosure of classified information."
fritya56
2010-12-02 02:20:15 UTC
images of stress prone diplomats fighting off rebels and terrorists , evening dress complete with cumerbund and dicky bow , suggestions of making trade and oil deals ( which is all done by somebody else ) and they are just BITCHES !



Watch for the side show of real problems or something they are bvurying. they phone each other up and ask what they are wearing the male staff sit down on the toilet when they want to urinate .
anonymous
2010-12-02 02:07:15 UTC
It's easier now than you think to get a job. Many employers go online now to list good paying jobs so you don't have to waste gas and money driving around. You can see all the available jobs in your city and what they pay. Go to FindMeJobNow.com
Hafiz
2010-12-02 02:50:36 UTC
I personally feel like having your secret paramour out for public scrutiny...lol! We got to know so many things which would have been difficult for us to know, had Wikileaks not made them public. The world will not be the same from now onwards, as far as diplomatic meetings are concerned. Please read the following By MATT APUZZO, Associated Press:



WASHINGTON – The U.S. government, apparently aided by freelance computer hackers, chased WikiLeaks from an American commercial computer network and temporarily stopped the leak of embarrassing diplomatic documents. But within hours, the website was back online, publishing from a fortified bunker in Sweden.



The virtual chase Wednesday was mirrored by a real-life pursuit as European authorities hunted for the site's fugitive founder, Julian Assange, who is wanted in Sweden on rape charges.



Undeterred, Assange continued releasing confidential government documents. Some showed how the Obama administration and Congress helped persuade Spain not to pursue charges against members of George W. Bush's administration for allowing torture of terrorism suspects.



Amazon.com Inc. prevented WikiLeaks from using the U.S. company's computers to distribute State Department communications and other documents, WikiLeaks said Wednesday. The WikiLeaks site was inaccessible for several hours before it returned to servers owned by its previous Swedish host, Bahnhof, which are housed in a protective Cold-War era bunker. Tech blogs have compared it to a lair from a James Bond movie.



"We have been under attack and we have had to move to different servers," WikiLeaks spokesperson Kristinn Hrafnsson said. "But we have ways and means to bypass any closure in our services."

Amazon's move to evict WikiLeaks from its servers came after congressional staff called the company to inquire about its relationship with WikiLeaks, Sen. Joe Lieberman, the Connecticut independent, said Wednesday.



"The company's decision to cut off WikiLeaks now is the right decision and should set the standard for other companies WikiLeaks is using to distribute its illegally seized material," Lieberman said in a statement. He added that he would have further questions for Amazon about its dealings with WikiLeaks.



The White House said it was taking new steps to protect government secrets after WikiLeaks released thousands of sensitive U.S. diplomatic cables. Officials said national security adviser Tom Donilon has appointed a senior aide to identify and develop changes needed in light of the document dump.



Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard called WikiLeaks' publication of classified documents "an illegal thing to do" on Thursday. But Gillard did not indicate Australia was about to take legal action against Australian-born Assange. The country's attorney general reiterated that authorities are investigating whether Assange has broken any Australian laws, but have not yet reached a conclusion.



The White House on Wednesday spurned a call from Assange for Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton to step down if she had any role in directing U.S. diplomats' spying on other foreign leaders. "Mr. Assange's suggestion is ridiculous and absurd, and why anyone would find his opinion here relevant is baffling," said spokesman Tommy Vietor, adding Clinton was doing an "extraordinary" job. The White House said U.S. diplomats do not engage in spying. Clinton was in Astana, Kazakhstan, enduring repeated comments about the WikiLeaks disclosures as she met with foreign officials at a conference of international leaders. Among those she met with was Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, who had been described in newly released U.S. diplomatic cables as "feckless" and a party animal. "We have no better friend, we have no one who supports the American policies as consistently as Prime Minister Berlusconi has, starting in the Clinton administration, through the Bush administration and now the Obama administration," she said during a summit of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.



The WikiLeaks matter was discussed in virtually all of Clinton's private one-on-one meetings with European leaders and foreign ministers during the summit meeting Wednesday.



more....
xpatinasia
2010-12-02 02:23:21 UTC
Neither.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...