I'm not going to waste my time giving links for you to dismiss as lies, irrespective of their source, when you feel that the BNP website is reliable.
Hairyman, Shevek and Guyzers have presented all the evidence you need.
But I'm concerned about the amount of time that you spend defending and promoting the "Nazi thugs" in the BNP, when you claim to be a Conservative supporter, and preparing an article for your local candidate. You do realise that you are working to have elected as PM, David Cameron, a "self confessed member of Red Fascist group UAF?" And the "Nazi thugs" here are his words!
I don't doubt that you are writing an article in support of your local Conservative candidate.
I doubt very much that your local Conservative candidate has solicited this article; yet knows he / she will receive this article; or indeed will want to use this article!
EDIT: Could anyone out there translate Redmonk's nonsense into English, please?
I got the bit about "you cant have the SWP or UAF without supporting the violence connected to those orginisations".
How to explain it so Redmonk can understand?
Let's try "YES YOU CAN". It is perfectly possible to sympathise with the aims of an organisation, but to not support some of their tactics or methods.
In my case I don't support the SWP. I support the aims of the UAF, but feel they should control and remove those who go beyond peaceful protest. Now Redmonk, is that simple enough for you to understand? Or do you need it in pictures?
I presume that you manage to support the BNP, without subscribing to their race-hate and their violent activities then? Oh, of course - Redmonk doesn't have to be consistent!