Question:
how is the war in iraq for oil?
Jesse
2010-03-15 15:48:59 UTC
Everyone at my high school believes that our country is so terrible because we are so corrupt that we faked 9/11 and are in Iraq for oil. And for one thing I do not believe in those 9/11 conspiracy because it's very biased and doesn't make sense even though they have "facts" and "evidence", but I've already seen those conspiracies proven wrong many times. And if the government wanted people to not think they blew up the towers I'm pretty sure they would do a better job and kill the people that would compromise them. Anyways for the main question I'm just wondering how are we in Iraq for oil if gas prices have been more expensive since 2001 and have been in a recession! And I've seen a few statistics that show that the US has not been getting any more oil since 2001, so I don't understand why people believe that...
Six answers:
Francis
2010-03-15 15:57:25 UTC
Well, you're certainly right about the whole 9/11 thing, the truther argument is a load of paranoid codswallop.



As for the Iraq War, there have been numerous suggestions as to why it was undertaken, oil being just one, very popular, reason. The official line was that Iraq was invaded to rid Saddam's regime of WMDs. This changed midstream when it was revealed that there were no WMDs. The official line became 'regime change', an argument that also didn't fly, given the number of other regimes that pose an alleged threat.



Some believe the war was a personal one for GWB, to finish the job his father didn't. Some believe that it was a demonstrative attempt to stamp American dominance on the region. Whatever the cause, your argument that the war was not about oil is perfectly reasonable on the grounds that, if you raid a country for its resources...you take the resources. America buys its oil from Iraq, Iraq still owns its oil and America gets no more oil from Iraq now than it did before. But their presence in the region is a sign of their willingness to mess with people.
tedrow
2016-12-07 13:58:42 UTC
furnish and demand has no longer some thing to do with it. China and India are presently receiving their oil from Suda, Venezuela, and different coming up international locations. there is lots and a number of of oil in the Persian gulf, or the middle East. earlier the war, oil replaced into about $27, and now, it truly is over $143 because of the worthless value that the dollar incorporates, it truly is critically inflated if we proceed to pay for those wars. also, the FED devaluated the dollar, and they lessen prices of activity at the same time as printing it out of skinny air! This merely makes the problem even worse. IF we had gold/silver as our major backing to the dollar, gasoline ought to've been an same value because it replaced into earlier the Iraq invasion. It merely that "fiat currencies" in no way paintings, it truly is in effortless words paper and it is going to have a tendency to get destroyed surely if we save printing, printing, spending and spending. All this impacts the dollar, the commercial gadget, and the human beings. Take care.
anonymous
2016-04-06 04:27:36 UTC
Before the 2003 invasion, Iraq's domestic oil industry was fully nationalized and closed to Western oil companies. A decade of war later, it is largely privatized and utterly dominated by foreign firms.

From ExxonMobil and Chevron to BP and Shell, the West's largest oil companies have set up shop in Iraq. So have a slew of American oil service companies, including Halliburton, the Texas-based firm Dick Cheney ran before becoming George W. Bush's running mate in 2000.



The war is the one and only reason for this long sought and newly acquired access.



Full coverage: The Iraq War, 10 years on

Oil was not the only goal of the Iraq War, but it was certainly the central one, as top U.S. military and political

figures have attested to in the years following the invasion.

"Of course it's about oil; we can't really deny that," said Gen. John Abizaid, former head of U.S. Central Command and Military Operations in Iraq, in 2007. Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan agreed, writing in his memoir, "I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil." Then-Sen. and now Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said the same in 2007: "People say we're not fighting for oil. Of course we are."
maxmom
2010-03-15 15:57:47 UTC
Iraq was 90% about the oil.



A large portion of future oil rights in Iraq have been given to US companies.
anonymous
2010-03-15 15:52:11 UTC
its not about the oil, they were a threat to israel, this is why all the focus is now on iran, if the war was about oil we'd invade canada, venezuela, or saudi arabia
Subversive Change
2010-03-15 15:51:19 UTC
so far, very well after Obama caved to the needs of the military..thanks for asking


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...